Architecture for review and follow-up of the SDGs: Options for the High-Level Political Forum
This briefing note discusses options for the architecture for review and follow-up of the Sustainable Development Goals in the context of the High-Level Political Forum.
The paper discusses the institutional design principles for review mechanisms, in the first section, and then in the second section it describes how we see the design choices in a way that may be helpful for negotiators preparing for the May 2015 Session on Monitoring & Review of the Post-2015 Intergovernmental Negotiations.
Related HLPF documents:
Building an Effective Review Mechanism: Lessons for the HLPF
Options for the HLPF Review Mechanism: Background for the 2nd Workshop, New York, May 15, 2014
Participating experts
You might also be interested in
Border Carbon Adjustment Mechanisms and Impacts on Vietnam
This report consolidates, analyzes, and presents views and perspectives of stakeholders from Vietnam on border carbon adjustment (BCA) schemes to contribute to the global debate on BCA good practices.
Decarbonization of the Mining Sector
This report critically examines the mining sector's role in the global energy transition and its alignment with international climate commitments.
Model Inter Se Agreement to Neutralize the Survival Clause of the Energy Charter Treaty Between the EU and Other non-EU Contracting Parties
An analysis of how the European Union (EU) and other contracting parties of the Energy Charter Treaty (ECT) could modify the treaty among themselves to neutralize the survival clause and prevent future fossil fuel investment arbitrations.
The United Kingdom's Strategy for Carbon Border Adjustment in a Changing Global Landscape
This report consolidates, analyzes, and presents views and perspectives of United Kingdom stakeholders on its proposed Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM) to contribute to the global debate on international principles and best practices for national border carbon adjustment schemes.