New report reveals BRICS governments’ revenues from fossil fuels
Geneva, November 13, 2019 – As the BRICS leaders’ summit starts in Brazil, a new report is the first of its kind to bring together data on both revenues and subsidies related to fossil fuels in Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa.
Geneva, November 13, 2019 – As the BRICS leaders’ summit starts in Brazil, a new report is the first of its kind to bring together data on both revenues and subsidies related to fossil fuels in Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa.
Beyond Fossil Fuels: Fiscal Transition in BRICS, from the Global Subsidies Initiative (GSI) of the International Institute for Sustainable Development (IISD) and Leave it in the Ground (LINGO), estimates that, in 2017, taxes and other revenues from fossil fuel production and consumption amounted to 23.6 per cent of general government revenue in Russia, 17.8 per cent in India, 6.8 per cent in both Brazil and South Africa, and 4.2 per cent in China.
Experts warn that governments receiving a lot of revenue from fossil fuels—whether through their consumption or production—will see a sudden gap in their budgets if they don’t start adapting their fiscal policy to the clean energy transition.
“Moving away from fossil fuels will lead to a decrease in revenues for the BRICS governments in two ways: There will be a drop in fossil fuel prices and, over the longer term, less demand for and less supply of fossil fuels,” said Ivetta Gerasimchuk, co-author of the report and lead for Sustainable Energy Supplies at IISD. “These risks are especially noteworthy for fuel exporters among BRICS: Russia for all fossil fuels, India for refined oil products, Brazil for crude oil and South Africa for coal. China and India also have pockets of dependence on fossil fuel production in coal-extracting regions,” she added.
“The BRICS governments’ budgets are already being eroded by subsidies to both fossil fuel production and consumption,” said Kjell Kühne, the research co-author, founder and director of Leave it in the Ground. “As we enter the fossil fuel endgame and the fossil fuel industry becomes less profitable, coal, oil and gas producers are pressuring governments for subsidies even more. It’s a vicious circle.”
Researchers focus on BRICS as a group of countries that increasingly influence the future of the global clean energy transition due to their growing role in the world’s economy and energy markets. In turn, the clean energy transition also affects BRICS through international climate commitments, the plummeting costs of renewables and domestic efforts to improve energy efficiency, energy security and local air quality.
This report calls on the BRICS governments to foster economic and fiscal diversification and strategic use of the current revenues from fossil fuels. To improve their fiscal stability, governments should phase out fossil fuel subsidies. In the short-to-medium term, they can also increase taxes on fossil fuels and carbon. Such revenues should be used as a temporary bridge to help fund the costs of transition.
Researchers also stress the need to use a portion of ongoing revenues from fossil fuels to cover the social cost of the clean energy transition, including the costs of protecting vulnerable groups. All BRICS countries have significant income inequality, and large portions of their populations are vulnerable to energy price increases. For vulnerable consumers, as well as for communities and workers dependent on fossil fuels, it is necessary to implement targeted support programs such as cash transfers, social safety nets and reskilling training. For example, China runs the CNY 100 billion (USD 14.5 billion) Industrial Special Fund for employment restructuring in coal-dependent areas.
Finally, BRICS governments need to harness public finance institutions and state-owned enterprises as vehicles of economic diversification for a clean energy transition. There are some signs of such diversification already emerging through the BRICS’s New Development Bank, Coal India Limited, and the merger of state-owned enterprises Shenhua and Guodian in China.
“The earlier the fiscal and broader socioeconomic aspects of the clean energy transition are anticipated, the less disruptive, less costly and more constructive the change will be for BRICS,” says Ivetta Gerasimchuk.
For media inquiries, please contact
Paulina Resich presich@iisd.org
About Global Subsidies Initiative (GSI)
The IISD Global Subsidies Initiative (GSI) supports international processes, national governments and civil society organizations to align subsidies with sustainable development.
About IISD
The International Institute for Sustainable Development (IISD) is an award-winning independent think tank working to accelerate solutions for a stable climate, sustainable resource management, and fair economies. Our work inspires better decisions and sparks meaningful action to help people and the planet thrive. We shine a light on what can be achieved when governments, businesses, non-profits, and communities come together. IISD’s staff of more than 250 experts come from across the globe and from many disciplines. With offices in Winnipeg, Geneva, Ottawa, and Toronto, our work affects lives in nearly 100 countries.
You might also be interested in
Unlocking Supply Chains for Localizing Electric Vehicle Battery Production in India
This study aims to highlight the key supply chain barriers in localizing electric vehicle (EV) battery cell manufacturing in India. It summarizes consultations with 12 companies, as well as experts and policy-makers, to determine the crucial challenges and opportunities in localizing battery manufacturing in India.
What Is the NAP Assessment at COP 29, and Why Does It Matter?
At the 29th UN Climate Change Conference (COP 29) in Baku, countries will assess their progress in formulating and implementing their National Adaptation Plans. IISD’s adaptation experts Orville Grey and Jeffrey Qi explain what that means, and what’s at stake.
COP 29 Must Deliver on Last Year’s Historic Energy Transition Pact
At COP 29 in Baku, countries must build on what was achieved at COP 28 and clarify what tripling renewables and transitioning away from fossil fuels means in practice.
IISD Welcomes Draft Regulations for Oil and Gas Pollution Cap
A firm cap on emissions can provide certainty for industry to invest in decarbonization, while ensuring the sector is on a path to net-zero by 2050.